The order of accountants spoke, many journalists have the opportunity to insist on that theme smoky and propaganda of the taxation of 'income'. To begin the accountants have spoken of rates on income from financial operations, which is not an annuity. Just as speculators are not the monsters that come from space but professionals in the study of the evolution of the market. This climate witch-hunt which indicated speculators in the enemy responsible for financial crisis - which is false, totally false, as recent scandals have objective and non-economic explanations have been caused by the desire of speculators to do so - is blurring the revenues of an investment more or less risky with an income annuity that is instead tied to a law, such as board, food, family allowance, the scholarship. Not to mention the brazen denial of evidence of European summits when they pretend that the public debt of pigs does not reflect a weakness specific to the common currency - the other day he escaped to Merkel said that in fact they are saying bales for years and there is the possibility that some countries are thrown out of the euro to enable better not to give up the money like so much stronger than the Germans since the days of the mark.
still get the rate on income from financial assets, these securities, bonds, shares, securities and interest cash letter in general. We analyze the genius of the accountants. If the taxes on the yield (income return is not, I repeat for the umpteenth time, the only still in our income tax and the rent on Sundays, a tax on agricultural land calculated on the cadastral tables dating back to Fascism, and also first, perhaps to the Middle Ages, perhaps the prehistory because it is a stupid tax calculated spans), if the tax increase, I said, means that the net return is reduced. If the net return decreases, it means that the bots become less attractive and the state must increase the rates to be able to place them. Taxes are always possible, transferred or legally circumvented. If you tax more Italian securities compared to foreign securities means that the capital, Italians and foreigners are fleeing abroad. I'm not using exclamation points but I think the seriousness of the implications are clear even to those who have never opened a book of business, especially those who have never opened a book of economics but has too many open policy.
Abroad encourage foreign companies to open tax-free the first year, encourage the entry of foreign capital by choosing advantageous rates, help balance the market refraining from using instruments highly competitive distortions that prevent the principles of play its role of engine of growth in economies modern. At the same time give all this great trouble to hit 'the forces of evil' does not produce even knows what great benefits of becoming fat than those already obese and a drain already squeezed by a people here in the next 80 years. The economies of countries that choke because they have to pay interest on the accumulated debt can not be solved by increasing levels of taxation that are already overly punitive. Now rates are low all over the world for decades, the public debt is cheap, wait until you see what happens when the crisis ends and leave rates, expect to see governments to convince someone to buy the bonds must be afforded 5 %, 10% maybe 20% and in so doing sees lower the ratings and the looming risk of default. All this
accountants, or rather the order of accountants, that here in Italy only if there would give the slightest opportunity to revive even the medieval guilds of arts and crafts, the order suggests to increase taxes and is an example that he could not do more stupid. He says if one invests 5 million 150 thousand euro to get 3% on which pay 12.5% \u200b\u200binstead of 38.45% of those who make the same money working. One point if he invested 5 million in 20 different banks as you find out, by a totalitarian police state? If you use the many possibilities of international finance in order to leave Italy to 5 million, removing them from availability of our production system, you order from accountants you a pat on the back and you say good? If investing in stocks and lost everything can enter the figure in box loss of the tax return and the State shall make the refund of 38.45%? No, the State makes the gesture of the umbrella, because if repayment would be easy to find a way to cheat the state coffers by creating, investing and making the companies fail.
An order of accountants who use terms like 'bloody withdrawal' not doing politics? If you read the whole text there are no intellectual setting of the real scholars of economics, this is simply a document using the orders to express support for this or that party. The beauty is that then complain of coercive levy of taxes, fanning the danger of a police state tax, this in a country that has 50% of submerged, where orders have been closed in the bunker when it was proposed the hypothesis to prohibit cash payments in settlement of professional services for figures not cheap. VAT invoice without saves, is the national motto. I really do not know that the valuation of investments are made after tax? It means you can raise taxes of 90% and have resulted in only embarrass those seeking funding by issuing bonds. If your company needs to borrow money abroad because they will ask them here, on equal terms, only because of a greedy taxation, should pay more in interest to get them. If you want to give more kick to Italy in the mouth such ideas are perfect, by dint of insisting with policies that have so much ideological as they have little rational, able to blow himself up or down the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment