Subtitle: that of children, death, the herd of Avatars and the Borg, and Communists who eat them, the children.
When you do not provide children with the tools to develop a critical sense, the exercise of intelligence aimed at sorting and evaluation of concepts and values \u200b\u200bthat can be developed individuality conscious, structured on the basis of belief meditate and freely chosen. When prevented the occurrence of the spontaneous process of strengthening the critical sense and its deficiency in the social structure is revealed as a strong anomaly, dangerous and very harmful. When growing up is not encouraged to give substance to their individuality, perhaps because of a policy that confuses individuality with individualism, an evolution of the costumes and castrating manipulative, for reasons I do not care at the time to investigate. When the population contains a large number of individuals with no individuality or formarsela or denied the right to express it freely. When does all this without ever being shown the problem and the cancer persists in the complete intellectual indifference of those who produce and renew the culture, then we are faced with a generation or more ill, a company shot in the legs, rendered sterile, where the inability to generate future is evident especially in proposing the bole of a dialectic in the past already iperanalizzata which becomes gradually more and more insurmountable, accompanied by the presence of older generations who spent their task, persist and do not contribute physically handovers, indeed, he shall perform and discharge the responsibility, claiming the salvific role of the typical parental relationship, if I was not there I'd be under a bridge.
One can not lie on the couch an entire society. However, we can launch a message in a bottle and this message is the same as Socrates, as you know yourself that all posts of philosophy and theology, and, again, inexhaustible inexhaustible to direct - I do not say drive, the words have meaning, not all synonyms are equal, choose the right word is and should always be a difficult task - the human experience in the cycle of life, the little brackets of time given to us as quickly as possible to take possession of all past experiences and use them to crawl If we succeed, an inch forward as individuals and as a species. But often what we want is distraction, not look down there, where we will end and the unknown after the end. Not to think we all accept the invitations of the sins and virtues. This we are: something that takes commitment not to yield to nichilsmo a meaningless life where you are born exclusively to die and suffer in the meantime. The culture of death given by the Pope, can not remember if this or the previous one, which is characterized by the fact that death is sublimated, is placed under a bond of taboos, is hidden. A culture that exalts youth, beauty, happiness, wealth, and so on, where death is a punishment, a release, something to which it must be addressed quickly, which is not worth worrying about because it would only prevent the enjoyment healthy and pure who know, even if voluntarily, because unconsciously they can do just an animal unconscious.
But we go down one level, gliding on the ground of material behavior, attitudes found in everyday life. Summarize: lack of critical sense, and lack of individuality, and lack of courage to take positions contrary to the dominant, and inability to escape the hegemonic power of a generation that, to avoid conflict with their children, fathers and mothers to be friends of the children continues to exercise a power wasted, ineffective and counterproductive. But I said it went down a level. Let's talk about us, we talk about when someone tells you X is strong / good / beautiful / smart / quelchetipare X and you do not know who he is, what do you do? Ask about X, go get the stuff and studies of X, turn on your personal and critical power, based on what you are, decide independently on X? Or your support for X depend on other factors, such as the fact that it looks on TV, which is at the top of the charts, that your support will not be any criticism from your friends in your group / bunch of reference? Change something for you to give an opinion on whether X is any one guy or someone who already estimates / admire / envy? Or just depends on the quality of information about X that you receive? If we are honest enough to admit it, we must confess to being at the mercy of opinion makers, the so-called testimonial that bind their celebrity to a product and lend themselves to play in promoting and advertising campaigns. It is not only a cultural event, the lack of critical sense, is linked to psychological factors but also exquisitely human to mechanical factors, the logic of production and consumption, the rules of coexistence that emerge and are derived from economic necessity and by natural constraints.
But I said we landed at the sensor. We can talk about Avatar, to name the last film with box office records. You who are going to see it because you go there? Why are you interested in analyzing what the script even though it follows patterns abused in three acts, will undoubtedly come out enriched subplots related to issues of policy, environmental considerations, even ontological cues from metempsychosis technology. Or you have been told that with the glasses you think that things come at you? Or why it cost so much and is the director of Titanic? The meaning of my question boils down to: How did you develop in your life your critical sense, as you came out victorious in the war to do with yourself in the eyes of yourself, an original person, unique and special? To put it brutally, why argue with you should give me something else that I can give a fight with a child who is still necessarily a vague and undefined structure the self? If this applies to the purchase of an entertainment product, let alone when we move into serious things: literature, politics, art history, all those matters on which it is not enough to show off mechanical reasoning skills, such as science, but must have been completed the critical sense, or worse still it could develop. What is freedom of speech if nobody can use it to demonstrate the critical sense of individuality responsible?
science goes, that's fine, but there is only one. The science already in the past has led us to want to help the evolution by killing all those unable to adapt gradually the species. Science has produced Communism and Nazism, I want to be clear on this. It was not an aberration from the faith or motivated by irrational feelings inexpressible, there was the appearance of a social mind, the so-called queen of the Borg hive mind, which did not take enough account of the advice of science to produce monster shaft Nietzche. That is the only advice I would give, if my advice had some value for someone, is to develop your individuality, which is not to be closed for socializing. Individuality is not individualism and sociality is not socialism. Would you give up the burden of a conscious life to the lightness of a life delegated. Fight for the school system, family, society in general provides for the right and freedom to think independently and autonomously, with no one glares at you, you punish, or does not help you as you would if you insist on not being to yourself that you are without anyone telling you that you're stupid because you're one of the few who does not think that X and Y is to be applauded by whistling.
The logic of the pack is such that there must always be someone out from the pack, a weak attack and destroy, even for fun, but when there are more elements out of the pack this logic, to survive, it must create enemies within their own ranks. That's what we've seen happen too many times in totalitarian states, dictatorships, regimes, but also in democracies are ill, you should not believe to be away from everything once in a while just because we are putting a cross on the ballot. We have seen governments bring the economy to collapse, causing famine so severe as to document widespread cannibalism, not one to take that awareness in the population had been inhibited or amputee critical sense. By the way, just make jokes about fucking communists eat children, this is an example of how you feel in our country lack a critical sense of honest, only a puppet in a country with an empty head you can joke about certain things . True, the Communists ate them children, there is nothing to laugh at, are horrible tragedies that remain so even if they were not then under Communist governments, however, is a fact, is under communist governments that have occurred so severe economic crisis, still guilty hidden and minimized. It happened in Stalin's Russia, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, in Mao's China, North Korea, even children have been kidnapped, murdered, and sold to the market as 'special meat'. It's all documented, see for example 'Wild Swans. Three Daughters of China. "By Jung Chang. The risk of living in a mass society, taking responsibility away, alienated, is to be misogynist, misanthropic, asocial, to feel alone against the world. It is easier to follow the herd, and if you learn not to do so risks to find yourself alone in a dark forest, so that the straight path.
0 comments:
Post a Comment