Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Statistics Of Appendicitis

calendar, you savage.

These days you can not talk about anything that does not take Egypt as a background, or why no one is here in Egypt, because this is what many people on the Internet asks on the sly , while producing a flurry of parchment soaked quivering with indignation and revolutionary hopes. Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, as when it first showed in Paris and London to Rome to give the impression that history had entered the screening room of the rollers 1789, a 3D remake, to be enjoyed with ideological glasses. The application overlay that with the glasses do not see about popular consent, the fact that as the media and the judiciary discharges scandalizzino trips, voters do not react.

This is what sends the opinion that the crazy days of entering the girl's iron self-control democratic, pluralist dell'aplomb wear a muzzle. The same people who then do not make it to restrain and throw more fuel on the fire of indignation popular highlight the events, a foretaste of the celebration that followed the fall of Pharaoh italics. The frustration is so great that the enemy would throw down all those who vote, are millions, who voted, who continue to support him in spite of the field has fallen in the cavalry has arrived, the air cover, the battlefield is all fire and flames, and yet we have fallen, you see a soldier does not say dead, but not injured.

looks like a computer game written by a programmer who wants to take you around: finally get to the final boss, I attack with everything you have and what is not only there but when the elections will come out again the odious written 'game over', 'insert coin to continue'. Since 1994 the current opposition insert coin to continue playing a game that has proved largely impossible to win. Yet he insists, wants to throw down the final boss and go to the next level, as if there really is a next level when ready to oppose a new government, led by a different boss. Because this is what happens, voters will not vote for who killed the boss, in their view of the game the boss should not be killed, it should be defeated in the elections.

vice-president of the main opposition party the other night, unable rimangiarsela in toto, it was still in part the position of the party? hers alone? on the sheet, saying that he wants to say the past is that now is no time pulling the ball in tax evasion. It has also ceased to defend the ICI. The good thing the president said: we write the program and who is not signing does not become our ally. It's already better than to say we are willing to compromise of all kinds just to put your ass in the chair of the government. The issue of fidelity of the allies, those willing to support a role of mere external lacking in identity, after the vote is still a risk factor. But this is trivial

election tactic, not going to touch the true nature of politics, the so called powers that be, the corporate pressures, partisan interests, the plots between economics and politics, between institutions and politics, between lobbies and policy. Guys wake up, this is politics, not the one you see on TV. Politics is the clash between those who give and receive is favored by a law, that school reform, justice reform, tax reform. Politics is struggle between those who want to maintain the status quo, conservatives, and those who want to change the situation, the progressives. Who gets stuck in boxes of historical ideological left and right to enjoy the projection in 3d while elsewhere things are real and concrete.

Throughout this included international relations, political but also economic, we import resources, we can not raise their voices with those who sell oil and gas and allows us to pay for going to his house to build roads and bridges, or placing it in diplomatic issues. Then if you prefer to hold onto the glasses and watch the movie you propose to wrest the vote go ahead, my only fear is that you from loading of anger to the point where you blow up mess ago evil. Have you ever thought that maybe when it drops the Pharaoh into power Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot? Well, think about it, because you can, it has already happened, it could happen again. I remind you that Hitler was elected, did not even have even have to come to power by force.

The impression then is that we are facing a major failure of policy. In the sense that the killing of the head of the government for its own sake is ridiculous when it moves to a vote. The evidence is that the electorate is not voting for the head of government but is voting for a party program, is voting for the political party that proposed the reforms. Reform is therefore the key word. Now, we can stay here for months to argue that there is or is not a crime, whether or not there is judicial persecution, or that there is less conflict of interest. The truth is that it takes to watch a movie to avoid involvement in the war underground on reforms, restructuring of the budget or put on pieces such as the charge sheet that breaks down the debt in order to continue to maintain high levels of public spending. And Europeans are the parameters to set the poles, for luck, to call for rigor in public accounts.

So if you like to continue to believe that the issue is centered on the life of the Prime Minister on the person of the head of government, and made away with him everything will be better ... Well, happy you. What I'm wondering I, I watch another film, what about the reforms and the economic crisis and the Immigration and competition is at work on products of developing countries, a movie where there are no naked women, unfortunately, a boring movie but someone has to while watching. I wonder what I was saying, and what to write the history books, if men of the future will look at the head of government investigations into the calling history. And I also wonder: if it really is not guilty, how do you live? It's horrible for me to imagine being accused of something because the accusation against me become subordinate to certain political projects. It's a dirty thing, very dirty. But not because there is a story of people having sex for money or, at least, not only for that.

0 comments:

Post a Comment